Skip to Main Content

Research Assistance: RESEARCH ASSISTANCE

RESEARCHING THROUGH QML: HOW WE CAN HELP

Quimby Memorial Library supports the research efforts of SWC students, faculty, and alumni, by providing access to databases of peer reviewed academic literature, curating resources on research methodology, processes, and ethics, and offering one-on-one help with librarians skilled in seeking out resources, aiding in search term formulation, and reaching for academic standards in research.

These pages offer information, support, and resources, to assist in key phases of the research process.

GETTING STARTED

In academics, the term "knowledge" refers to information that is accepted as being reflective and predictive of reality, based on evidence that is persuasive. That evidence is produced through the process of research, wherein proven methods of discovery are honestly and transparently applied. When evidence suggests that a claim is likely true or an intervention is likely effective, that new "knowledge" is presented by the researcher(s) to the greater academic community, where it is subject to review and where the methods used to derive it can be repeated in subsequent research designs. Research is a scientifically rigorous, communal, and often long process, but it all begins with an individual's curiosity and/or desire to help others.

But how do we turn curiosity or desire into a viable research question? Collected here are tools and supportive resources to assist in the conceptualization of your research focus and the earliest stages of research study design.

 

DEVELOPING A RESEARCH QUESTION

Inquiries, which ultimately shape and guide a research study, begin as informal, natural curiosities, born from our experiences, observations, frustrations, and passions. "What would happen if...?" "Is there a better way of doing this?" and "Why does this seem to be the case?" etc. To determine if such a naturally occurring inquiry will be suitable for research, compare it to these attributes of an effective research question (adapted from Hissong, Lape, & Bailey, 2015):

 

1. It rests on a rationale, addressing the question “How will this study contribute to knowledge of my field?”

2. It is relevant, important, and/or significant to the field, addressing the questions “Who cares?” and “So what?”

3. It can be studied by identifying specific variables that address questions of purpose, such as cause and effect, discovery of meaning, or in-depth understanding of a specific condition or perspective.

4. It is feasible or “doable,” meaning that it is manageable in scope and can be conducted with available resources, expertise, and skills.

5. It is appropriate and can be conducted with available access to participants, addressing such questions as whose participation is appropriate, where the study can take place, and how consent can be obtained.

6. It is ethical, meaning that it can be conducted within the standards of care that protect participants from harm or undue risk.

This video presents a detailed example of how to refine your curiosity into a question that meets the above criteria.

 

BEGINNING WITH A STATEMENT, RATHER THAN A QUESTION

Sometimes your curiosity does not take the shape of a question. Sometimes, a collection of interests or intersecting focuses form your initial inspiration for discovery. You can frame such interests/focuses in a way that sets up a trajectory for research by plugging them into the following structure:

 

“I want to study __________ in order to ____________ because ________________ .”

Inserting an initial idea, interest, or passion into this structure will guide you in developing a statement that reflects focus, motivation, and expectation. Take your time and be sure to populate these fields honestly and in a way that articulates what you are concerned with where you would like to go from here. The statement you end up with can be adapted as a research question, a hypothesis, or statement of the purpose of an eventual research study.

 

CONCEPT MAPPING

Once you have identified and refined your focus into one that will lend itself to the development of a structured, researchable inquiry, an important next step is to identify the concepts that make up your inquiry and the relationships between them. Identifying interconnected concepts that construct your curiosity, motivations, and intentions, sets up your research focus for the continued scrutiny and refinement it will undergo throughout the research process. An effective tool for this identification is concept mapping. The brief tutorial below demonstrates this tool and its value to the early stages of research.

 

MIND MAPPING
(University of Arizona)
This interactive site is an excellent method for digging into concept mapping - referred to here as "Mind Mapping".

RESEARCHING THROUGH DATABASES

 

QML provides two key databases for researching academic literature:

Taylor & Francis Online provides access to greater than 5 million articles from peer reviewed journals. Beginning your research process by entering keywords in T&F will allow you to:

  • try out and refine your keywords;
  • find synonyms and related terms, which can open additional avenues for resource discovery;
  • get an initial sense of how much literature exists on your topic and determine whether broadening or narrowing your topic might yield more relevant results;
  • perceive gaps in the existing literature, which represent opportunities for new knowledge creation, via your novel research idea;
  • access the most contemporary peer reviewed literature on your topic

EBSCOhost provides access to greater than 200,000 ebooks, including contemporary literature on art therapy and counseling practice, theory, and research. Feeding your keywords into EBSCO will allow you to:

  • refine your keywords
  • find synonyms and related terms for searching
  • access books which collect contemporary research findings and offer practical/professional applications of knowledge
  • consult sources which present, discuss, and compare peer reviewed literature, in language that is often more spacious and readable and less technical than that of academic articles

 

FORMULATING KEYWORDS

On the Getting Started tab, we discussed developing a research question and assessing the researchability of that question. Now in order to explore how published academic literature addresses and contextualizes your research question, you will need to break the question down into keywords. Effective keywords define the main concepts present in your question. Here's an example of how to distill a research question into keywords suitable for searching a database:

Question:

Is bibliotherapy an effective approach toward treating adolescent clients with depression?

Keywords:

bibliotherapy, adolescents, depression

In the above example, keywords define the parameters of the question by addressing: 

what? (what you want to learn about; the variable you would like to apply: bibliotherapy)

who? (to whom would you like to introduce that variable? what population provides specific context for the what? adolescents)

why? (why apply this variable to this population? what problem provides motivation for the application and/or means for measuring effectiveness? depression)

 

When you have arrived at keywords, which you feel define your inquiries parameters and provide the specifics necessary to retrieve relevant results, you are ready to enter those keywords into a database search field. The video below can help you get started with that step:

 

 

REFINING KEYWORDS

If your keywords are not returning the volume or quality of relevant results that you were expecting, it could be because you are utilizing keywords which reflect outdated terminology or perhaps terms which are used in popular discourse but not used in professional and/or academic contexts. In this case, your next step will be define synonyms and/or related terms, which will open additional channels toward discovery and connect you with a greater volume and variety of relevant resources. This video will introduce you to methods for using database functions to assist in finding synonyms for and terms related to your initial keywords

 

  • VIDEO TUTORIAL PENDING

 

HOW TO GENERATE SEARCH TERMS
(University of Texas Libraries)
Want a hand defining and organizing related terms before bringing them to database searched? This interactive tool, provided by University of Texas Libraries, is a great option.

 

MORE TIPS FOR FINDING USEFUL RESOURCES

Let's say you have defined your keywords through concept mapping, and refined your language by locating and adapting related terms and synonyms, however, results returned to your searches continue to be scarce. The likely reason for the small number of results is that your research topic is novel and has not been directly explored in academic literature. In the early stages of research, where it's so important to examine what studies have already been conducted and what potentialities they've defined, encountering a deficit of material to dive into can be frustrating. However, you shouldn't perceive it as a dead end or a signal to abandon your focus. Here are a few tips for getting over the stumbling block of scant literature on your topic:

  • Explore reference sections. If your search returns a small number of results (let's say only two articles are returned, which look relevant and useful to your research), one thing you can do is look to the reference sections, at the end of those articles. Every academic article will end with a comprehensive list of all pre-existing literature that the authors utilized in compiling a base of knowledge on their research topic, supporting their hypotheses, etc. These references will often include a wealth of material that could be directly relevant to your topic but which did not turn up in your initial database search. This brief video will demonstrate how to find additional literature through this method and what your next steps will be:
  • Explore secondary sources. In general academic writing, the primary source (which describes the process and methodology behind producing evidence for or against a hypothesis, usually written by the researcher(s) who executed that process) is considered the best source to apply to your literature review. However, if such primary sources on your desired topic are scant, consider taking a step back and exploring secondary sources, which may present useful summaries and applications of original research and provide windows through which primary sources might be identified. For example:
    • Ebooks often synthesize arguments around academic research and/or apply new knowledge to clinical or practical environments. Ebooks are a great resource for introducing oneself to new knowledge, as they are usually written in more plainspoken language than are academic papers. Just be sure that any ebook you consult is directly engaging with academic sources and providing citations in text and in references sections, at the end of each chapter.
    • Newspapers, magazines, and websites are similarly useful for discovering primary research in practical, readable, and understandable formats, as they often report on the findings of original research. Once again, look for citations pointing to primary sources. In all cases of secondary resource engagement, it is best practice to find, review, and ultimately cite the primary source in your own academic writing.
  • Explore other platforms. While QML aims to provide article and ebook databases, which offer an abundance of useful resources, we encourage you to explore the wider world of information, to ensure they are uncovering all material related to your topic or inquiry. The following places are recommended for searching sources beyond our curated digital databases.
    • Google Scholar is a window into academic papers hosted on a multitude of databases. If a PDF of an article's full text is hosted freely online, Google Scholar will helpfully provide a link. When it does not, though, you can always send a citation or URL for any article to librarians at QML, and we will track down the full text for you.
    • ResearchGate is a website which collects records of and key information about academic papers. Occasionally the full text of an article is posted on ResearchGate, even when it is not though, ResearchGate helpfully provides bibliographies of related research and an option to directly request access to full texts from authors.
    • QML's Catalog is another solid resource for discovering syntheses of contemporary research and leads on primary sources. Like our digital holdings, our physical collections are thoughtfully curated to include items that focus on academic literature, current theory and trends, and practical/clinical applications of knowledge. If you find a book in our library that meets your research needs, contact us at askthelibrary@swc.edu to discuss access options. We accommodate remote students by mailing items and scanning key sections and chapters to PDF.

EVALUATING RESOURCES

How can we determine a resource's sincerity and utility? How can we determine if the information put forward by a resource is valid? Determining validity of your potential sources is a crucial early step in the research process. After all, you can't build meaningful, useful new knowledge, unless you are starting from a foundation of honesty and transparency. But how can we make such determinations without personally repeating every method, testing every claim? 

This page will offer tips for discerning whether a resource is suitable for your academic research, based on the following criteria: currency, authority, accuracy, and transparency. Also included is information on evaluating websites and a video which aims to clarify the process of peer review and its importance to academic research. Click below to jump to:

Currency
Authority
Transparency
Evaluating Websites
Peer Review

The CRAAP Test

 

CURRENCY

When first encountering a resource, via a QML database or anywhere else, it's important to note the date of publication. Recently published material will be more useful for your research, because:

  • It represents better than earlier resources a contemporary state of the knowledge on your topic of interest
  • It engages with and builds from earlier research and assists us in understanding what knowledge from earlier research remains evident and relevant and which is outdated.
  • Its concepts, foci, research designs, sampling (when applicable), and findings are presented through contemporary cultural, social, and political contexts, and thus its knowledge is more applicable to practice and subsequent research, within those same contexts.

To determine the currency of a resource:

  • Refer to the resource's citationthe year of publication will appear in parentheses just after the authors' names.
     

    Devine, S. (2023). Therapeutic impact of public art exhibits during COVID-19. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 40(1). 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2022.2131359

  • Consult the resource's database record (the screen that displays information about the resource and links you to its full text). The date of publication for an article in Taylor & Francis, for instance, will usually be between the volume and issue numbers of its containing journal, as seen here:

 

  • Just be careful: often a date of online publication will be prominently displayed in an article's database record, and this date will vary from the actual date of the article's writing and publication. If you see the words "published online" accompanying a date, disregard that date and look to other publication information.

 

  • Look to the resource itself. The PDF of an article, for instance, will include publication data at the top or bottom of its first page.
  • Use a database filter to return only contemporary results. Want to bypass all of this citation, record, and resource scrutiny? Simply filter the results of your search by date range, to ensure you are reviewing only current literature. This brief tutorial will show you how:

 

 

Additional Notes on Currency:

What qualifies as "contemporary" in research literature?

The answer to this question varies, based on the subject area, among other factors. Generally social science research places particular importance on material published within the last five years, due the relatively quick pace at which research is built upon and knowledge created in that field. The best practice is to consult the instructor who assigned your research project. They will offer date parameters specific to the assignment's focus.

What if I want to use an older resource?

Even in social science research, plenty of 10, 20, and 30 year old resources remain valuable for their contributions. Some texts are considered foundational, as they introduced important new knowledge, which facilitated and continues to facilitate further research. Such resources can be beneficial to engage with in your writing. Just be sure to review assignment guidelines and consult with your instructor, to confirm that you will meet the paper's source requirements. 

Want to see what recently published texts engage with and build upon an earlier/foundational resource? Here's a trick:

 

 

AUTHORITY

A quick and easy indicator of a resource's likely utility for your research is the evident authority of its author(s). In this context, authority refers to the discernible credentials and qualifications of the author(s) and the institutional support that facilitated their research.

To determine the authority of a resource's author:

Consult the resource itself: On the title page of most academic articles, the author's credentials are listed right after their names. A current, popular method for displaying author credentials and qualifications is pictured in the below example, where lowercase letters act like footnotes, linking to fully listed credentials a little lower on the page:


 

Another method for determining an author's qualification is to view their full credits and credentials, by clicking on their Orcid ID in Taylor & Francis. Here's how to do that:

 

 

Additional notes on authority:

Can't somebody do good research without formal education, fancy credentials, and institutional affiliation? 

Yes. The absences of letters following a name, a long bibliography of pre-published works, and/or institutional affiliation do not automatically disqualify a researcher's work from academic review. However, these criteria serve as effective shortcuts for determining authority, and in their absence, it may take additional research to begin making this determination. For example, when affiliation with an accredited institution of higher learning is listed, we know that that the research study's methods and findings passed a standardized review process by an institutional review board (IRB). When no such affiliation is listed, we must actively search for evidence that similar qualified external guidance was utilized and academic rigors applied.

 

TRANSPARENCY

Regardless of the evident authority of its authors and the contemporaneousness of its publication, you must ultimately read and  review critically a research study, to determine its usefulness to your own research, the validity of its methods, and the truthfulness of its claims. Transparency is the most important quality to identify in your critical reading of a resource. The concept of transparency in research applies to:

  • METHODOLOGY: Is the process that the researcher employs in testing the hypothesis or addressing the research question clearly and thoroughly described? Are formal research methods applied? Is enough information about the process shared to facilitate its replication by subsequent researchers?
  • LITERATURE REVIEW: A valid research study will always refer extensively to pre-existing research and literature on its research topic, in order to establish the contemporary consensus of knowledge that contextualizes its own research and/or evidence specific gaps in knowledge, which its own research seeks to address. When evaluating a resource...
    • First confirm that previously published literature has been engaged with. A quick look at the references page at the end of an article or chapter will show you how many sources were consulted and give you data on their currency as well as on the journals in which they appear.
    • Next note the type of resources referenced. Review the citations provided in the references section. If you are seeing a healthy majority of research papers, published in academic journals, then chances are good that the authors were rigorous in doing their preliminary research and the study they subsequently executed was well-informed. A prevalence of less scholarly sources in the references section (e.g. websites and blog posts; magazines and news outlet, which are more likely to be relating research findings secondhand and with less transparency and context, or even books, which may or may not describe peer reviewed research), should be seen as a red flag.
  • LIMITATIONS and CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Any adequately transparent academic paper will detail the limitations of its methods, scope, design, etc. and clearly express any conflicts of interest that might be interpreted as influencing a study's focus or findings. If no conflicts of interest are noted, it's usually safe to assume that none exist. If no limitations are identified, however, this should be viewed as a red flag. All research efforts have their limits. Transparency about what those limits are must be expressed in tandem with findings, to help subsequent researchers understand how limitations could have affected results and what to consider specifically when conducting similar research.

 

EVALUATING WEBSITES

Websites are a convenient and free way to access information and a platform that empowers traditionally disenfranchised voices to share their ideas broadly. It's no secret, however, that the internet is fraught with bias, agenda, disinformation, and counterfeit facts, identities, and affiliations. When a website is presenting material that you would like to use in your research, consider the following criteria in evaluating the website, before you begin citing it.

How accurate is this website?

  • Is there a bibliography or a reference list?
  • Does the content make sense and match other sources that you have looked at?

Look at the authority of the website:

  • Who is the author?
    • A reputable organization?
    • An easily identifiable individual who has written more on this topic?
    • Is the author affiliated with an academic institution?
  • What is the URL?
    • A .com (commercial) site can be published by anyone
    • A .edu or .gov site indicates affiliation with an institution whose internal standards and modes of accountability are discoverable.

What is the context of the writing?

  • Is the author writing for personal or political reasons?
  • Are the arguments balanced?
  • Is there an evidence of a bias?

How current is the website?

  • Are the web documents dated?
  • When was the site last updated?
  • Look at the date of the items listed on the reference list, how old are they?
  • Are the links on the page broken?

What is the design like?

  • Is it professional looking and easy to navigate?

 

PEER REVIEW

(Under Construction)

 

The CRAAP Test

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Methodology in research refers to the mechanisms employed toward producing evidence for the accuracy/inaccuracy of a hypothesis or the efficacy/inefficacy of an intervention. While there is a multitude of methods, which can be used to test test hypotheses and explore curiosities, these methods are usually broken down into two categories: quantitative and qualitative. 

QUANTITATIVE METHODS
Characteristics
  • Collects data that is numeric or can be assigned numeric values
  • Uses empirical methods to investigate a hypothesis, a possible correlation, or a research question
  • Analyzes data through statistical tests
  • Efficient for producing data that can be confidently generalized to greater populations
  • Objectivity is idealized
  • Efforts are made to eliminate researcher bias
Types of Inquiries Addressed

Inquiries which can be addressed with numeric data:

How many...?

What percentage...?

What is the difference between...?

What is the measurement of effectiveness...?

Seeking evidence of correlation and cause and effect relationships:

What percentage of people who do one thing also do this other thing?

What measurable effect, if any, will this therapeutic intervention have on clients with depression?

Types of Quantitative Research

Descriptive (used to describe/quantify variables, to collect data on the existing status of things. Example: How many New Mexico residents smoke?)
Correlation (seeks to evidence relation of variables to each other. Example: How many clients reporting symptoms of depression also report insomnia?)
Quasi-Experimental (aims to demonstrate a cause/effect relationship between variables, without manipulating variables. Example: Two communities are similar in population, demographics, economics, education, culture, and diet, but one is experiencing hight levels of substance abuse. Given all the similarities, any variable identified between the communities could evidently correlate to the other variable of substance abuse.)

Experimental (in which one variable is manipulated in a controlled environment, to assess causal relationships between that variable and other variables being observed. Example: Stress is monitored via measurement of cortisol levels in one group of participants who are subjected to an art therapy intervention and compared to cortisol levels measured in another group not subjected to such an intervention.)

Tools

 

QUALITATIVE METHODS
Characteristics
  • Collects data concerned with meaning and meaning-making
  • Subjectivity is embraced (the researcher is the instrument of inquiry), but bias is accounted for via maximal transparency (the researcher's background, experience, etc. are laid bare within discussion of the research design)
  • Collects data that cannot be quantified or for which quantification is not helpful
Types of Inquiries Addressed

Inquiries concerned with meaning:

What is the experience of individuals within this refugee group?

How do people within a certain cultural context regard sex?

Inquiries into the structures of human experience and commonalities/generalizations detectable in that experience:

How do people find romantic partnership, in the interconnected world of social media?

How does an art-based assessment process influence whether clients will commit to therapy?

Types of Quantitative Research

Case Study (systematic analysis of a particular individual or entity, to make sense of all aspects of it. Example: a thorough analysis of a client's therapeutic experience and trajectory, via progress notes and researcher/therapist observations)
Ethnography (inquiry into a culture or group, via immersive field study. Example: What accounts for the conviction espoused by online proponents of flat earth theory?)
Phenomenology (systematic inquiry into the essence of a phenomenon (experience, object, event, disorder, etc. Example: What components of individuals' experiences of Stockholm Syndrome are universal?)

Tools
  • Interviews
  • Questionnaires and surveys
  • focus groups
  • client/progress notes

 

When determining what method of research you need to employ, let your inquiry guide your methodology. Ask yourself:

Am I concerned with statistics or meanings?
Do I want to produce data that can be generalized to greater populations?

Am I looking for evidence of a cause/effect relationship between variables?

Am I looking to better understand a certain cultural response to an issue or idea?

An honest look at your own curiosity and its fundamental elements and goals will lead to the right methodology for your research.

 

QML RESOURCES ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Collected below are searchable journalsarticles, and ebooks available to students and faculty of Southwestern College, via QML's databases.

You can retrieve credentials for accessing articles and journals from Taylor & Francis and ebooks from EBSCOhost by clicking here.

Need more information, instructions for access, or tips on databases use? Click here to learn more about Taylor & Francis and here to learn more about EBSCOhost.

 

JOURNALS

 

 

ARTICLES

 

 

EBOOKS

ETHICS

Ethical practices in research and academic writing are not only about fairness but accuracy. Dishonesty in data collection and reporting, failure to adequately credit sources… such approaches serve only to distance one’s scholarly work from truth and thus from usefulness. Aspiring to ethical standards maintains the soul of one’s work and accurately contextualizes its contributions within the wider world of scholarship and scientific knowledge. The following resources will help you define and achieve these standards.

___________________________________

QML RESOURCES ON RESEARCH ETHICS

Collected below are searchable journalsarticles, and ebooks available to students and faculty of Southwestern College, via QML's databases.

You can retrieve credentials for accessing articles and journals from Taylor & Francis and ebooks from EBSCOhost by clicking here.

Need more information, instructions for access, or tips on databases use? Click here to learn more about Taylor & Francis and here to learn more about EBSCOhost.

 

JOURNALS

 

ARTICLES

 

EBOOKS

Contact Us

Link not working?
Unsure how to find what you need?

Please reach out to us at askthelibrary@swc.edu.